Visit krishna-167929's column >>

KRISHNA-167929Home Page

I took the one less traveled by, And that has made all the difference. (Robert Frost)
Add To Watchlist
Articles Posted: 0; Links Seeded: 3591
Member Since: 7/2007

'Saudis would let IAF jets fly over kingdom on Iran mission'

advertisement

"Mossad head Meir Dagan assured Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu that Saudi Arabia would allow Israeli Air Force jets to fly over their kingdom during any future raid on Iran's nuclear facilities, The Sunday Times reported on Sunday.

According to the London daily, Dagan held talks with Saudi officials earlier this year on the topic. The Israeli media has already carried unconfirmed reports that high-ranking officials, including former prime minister Ehud Olmert, held meetings with Saudi colleagues.

What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user has on the current conversation. The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera). Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the left, in their corresponding group. Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
97
42
8.3
{"commentId":8031779,"authorDomain":"krishna109"}

Bolton, who has talked to a number of Arab leaders, added: "None of them would say anything about it publicly but they would certainly acquiesce in an over-flight if the Israelis didn't trumpet it as a big success."

Arab states would publicly condemn a raid when they spoke at the UN but would be privately relieved to see the threat of an Iranian bomb removed, Bolton said.

Moderate Sunni Arab states are becoming increasingly concerned about the stability of the repressive Shi'ite regime in Tehran and it emerging as a belligerent nuclear power.

"The Saudis are very concerned about an Iranian nuclear bomb, even more than the Israelis," a former head of research in Israeli intelligence told the Times.

Makes perfect sense. The Iranian Shia regime is nuts-- a nuke in their hands would be a great danger to many in the area. (If they can send in their cops with axes to decapitate their fellow Irnians when they protest..what could they do to "non-beleivers"?)

And tensions with many Sunni Arab states have been building. (Morocco has even broken off relation with Iran).

Relations between Egypt and Iran are tense:

Egypt: Tehran's leaders should learn from Saddam

Egypt state daily: Iran, Hamas, Hezbollah tried to overthrow Mubarak

Most Arabs won't miss Iran's ayatollahs if they fall

A new cold war in the Middle East

{"commentId":8031779,"threadId":"619577","contentId":"2998051","authorDomain":"krishna109"}
  • 10 votes
Reply#1 - Sun Jul 5, 2009 12:22 AM EDT
{"commentId":8031892,"authorDomain":"krishna109"}

Obama weighs in:

Obama: Iran cannot be permitted to be nuke power

And-- in the past I wonder if Egypt would've allowed this:

In possible signal to Iran, Israel sends subs through Suez Canal.

{"commentId":8031892,"threadId":"619577","contentId":"2998051","authorDomain":"krishna109"}
  • 9 votes
Reply#2 - Sun Jul 5, 2009 12:31 AM EDT
{"commentId":8031986,"authorDomain":"krishna109"}

More: Time for an Israeli Strike?

Iran's nuclear threat was never in doubt during its presidential campaign, but the post-election resistance raised the possibility of some sort of regime change. That prospect seems lost for the near future or for at least as long as it will take Iran to finalize a deliverable nuclear weapons capability.

With Iran's hard-line mullahs and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps unmistakably back in control, Israel's decision of whether to use military force against Tehran's nuclear weapons program is more urgent than ever.

{"commentId":8031986,"threadId":"619577","contentId":"2998051","authorDomain":"krishna109"}
  • 8 votes
Reply#3 - Sun Jul 5, 2009 12:40 AM EDT
{"commentId":8032028,"authorDomain":"worldknightboy"}

Saudi ok for air space transit is HUGE!!! Tick tock faster now!

{"commentId":8032028,"threadId":"619577","contentId":"2998051","authorDomain":"worldknightboy"}
  • 12 votes
Reply#4 - Sun Jul 5, 2009 12:44 AM EDT
{"commentId":8033015,"authorDomain":"watersportgirl"}

WKB, why are you so shocked? The Saudis have pretty much always hated Iran, although they have always tried to keep "nice-nice" diplomatic relations with their Muslim brothers on the surface.

Why do you think they let the U.S. have bases there? Why do you think the Saudis backed Iraq in their war with Iran with $25 billion? Did you know that the Saudi's blocked all Iranians from their Hajj pilgrimage in the late 80's?

The Saudis are like a cold, backbiting aunt at Thanksgiving. She invites you because she's proper. But she has utter distaste for you and will make that known in constant subtle ways...

{"commentId":8033015,"threadId":"619577","contentId":"2998051","authorDomain":"watersportgirl"}
  • 5 votes
#4.1 - Sun Jul 5, 2009 2:56 AM EDT
{"commentId":8033051,"authorDomain":"worldknightboy"}

I am PLEASED! The only SURPRISE is that no reports have emerged that the saudis patently deny this agreement!

{"commentId":8033051,"threadId":"619577","contentId":"2998051","authorDomain":"worldknightboy"}
  • 7 votes
#4.2 - Sun Jul 5, 2009 3:03 AM EDT
{"commentId":8033125,"authorDomain":"levofer"}
The only SURPRISE is that no reports have emerged that the saudis patently deny this agreement!

They will soon enough,Israel just did and you cant expect reports like that to keep doing the rounds without complete denial from all involved(even if they are true)better to keep it under wraps anyway.

The Prime Minister's Office denied the report Sunday morning, saying that Israel had no agreement with Saudi Arabia on allowing jets to fly over its territory on the way to a strike in Iran.
{"commentId":8033125,"threadId":"619577","contentId":"2998051","authorDomain":"levofer"}
  • 3 votes
#4.3 - Sun Jul 5, 2009 3:17 AM EDT
Reply
{"commentId":8032058,"authorDomain":"worldknightboy"}

Oh yeah, great contributions here, krishna! Your links to related and dynamic events is almost prescient!

{"commentId":8032058,"threadId":"619577","contentId":"2998051","authorDomain":"worldknightboy"}
  • 9 votes
Reply#5 - Sun Jul 5, 2009 12:48 AM EDT
{"commentId":8032147,"authorDomain":"levofer"}

Too much talk..I wish everybody just shut up about it(not you guys..)

When Israelis were just waking up that Sunday morning the Iraqi reactor was already hit and nobody knew what the hell was going on including Saddam,but in today's world I'm afraid it will be difficult to achieve surprise(maybe surprise is overrated this time around)

Happy 4th of July by the way.

{"commentId":8032147,"threadId":"619577","contentId":"2998051","authorDomain":"levofer"}
  • 8 votes
Reply#6 - Sun Jul 5, 2009 1:00 AM EDT
{"commentId":8032322,"authorDomain":"worldknightboy"}

Right now surprise is secondary at best, at least for the time being, especially regarding large, immovable ground targets. First, instill uncertainty and background anxiety! Then, add a little chaos. Later, misdirection, deception and unscheduled large events. Finally, the blows!

{"commentId":8032322,"threadId":"619577","contentId":"2998051","authorDomain":"worldknightboy"}
  • 6 votes
#6.1 - Sun Jul 5, 2009 1:18 AM EDT
{"commentId":8032404,"authorDomain":"levofer"}
Right now surprise is secondary at best

however still important,especially to give Israelis enough time to get ready and embrace whatever comes next,from the South and the North I suspect.

{"commentId":8032404,"threadId":"619577","contentId":"2998051","authorDomain":"levofer"}
  • 5 votes
#6.2 - Sun Jul 5, 2009 1:28 AM EDT
{"commentId":8032509,"authorDomain":"worldknightboy"}

Here's the thing about attacks from the south and north- your ground forces will crush them, with close air support that will not take any assets from your long range missions to natanz et al. You guys mobilize in 24 hours pretty well, right? The big worry is civil defense preparations, as no doubt lots of rockets and mortars from gaza and south Lebanon will be landing in Israel for several hours up to maybe 48 hours, or however long it takes your splendid army to utterly eviscerate hamas and hezbollah with no holds barred. I guess there won't be much time, when the bell is rung, to phone civilians ahead of time to evacuate before the bombs and artillery shells land this time. Oh well, in war there is always collateral damage.

{"commentId":8032509,"threadId":"619577","contentId":"2998051","authorDomain":"worldknightboy"}
  • 5 votes
#6.3 - Sun Jul 5, 2009 1:41 AM EDT
{"commentId":8032555,"authorDomain":"levofer"}
as no doubt lots of rockets and mortars from gaza and south Lebanon will be landing in Israel for several hours up to maybe 48 hours,

If that's all it is then no sweat.

;)

{"commentId":8032555,"threadId":"619577","contentId":"2998051","authorDomain":"levofer"}
  • 4 votes
#6.4 - Sun Jul 5, 2009 1:46 AM EDT
{"commentId":8032610,"authorDomain":"worldknightboy"}

Yeah, but the tiny odds that Iran already has nukes- possibly from Pakistan (China, even?)- on their own missiles puts a huge premium on your anti-missile shield!

{"commentId":8032610,"threadId":"619577","contentId":"2998051","authorDomain":"worldknightboy"}
  • 6 votes
#6.5 - Sun Jul 5, 2009 1:54 AM EDT
{"commentId":8032656,"authorDomain":"krishna109"}
Too much talk..I wish everybody just shut up about it(not you guys..)

Why?

The possibility of an Israeli attack has been discussed for some time now-- this topic is nothing new..

And-- there's no indication here of when it will happen-- or if it will.

Its even possible that Israel won't attack Iran at all.

Actually, IMO, the big story here is not about the military aspect of this-- but rather the political aspect. Namely, its another indication of how much the past "solidarity" of the Muslim world has crumbled-- and o f the split between Iran and many Sunni states. (The fact that Saudi Arabia might let Israel use its airspace to attack an Islamic country would have been unthinkable a while back...).

They are beginning to openly admit what any half-way intelligent person knew all along-- the real danger to countries in the area comes from exztrmeist states , such as Iran. Israel has no intention of attacking any country for no reason if they are not attacked first. But the madmen of Iran are another matter entirely...

{"commentId":8032656,"threadId":"619577","contentId":"2998051","authorDomain":"krishna109"}
  • 5 votes
#6.6 - Sun Jul 5, 2009 1:59 AM EDT
{"commentId":8032716,"authorDomain":"levofer"}

Again I'm referring to the officials who are discussing it,(or leaking it)unless it's done on purpose as part of a bigger plan Imo it's not helpful.

{"commentId":8032716,"threadId":"619577","contentId":"2998051","authorDomain":"levofer"}
  • 4 votes
#6.7 - Sun Jul 5, 2009 2:08 AM EDT
{"commentId":8032737,"authorDomain":"krishna109"}
The big worry is civil defense preparations, as no doubt lots of rockets and mortars from gaza and south Lebanon

Apparently Hizb'Allah has many more rockets than before the war. And they are defintiely a puppet of Iran. however, if they shot rockets at Israel, the consequences for them would be severe.

Another scary thought is Hizb'Allah operatives attacking targets in western cities-- including the U.S.

And-- Iran blocking oil shipping out of the Gulf.

{"commentId":8032737,"threadId":"619577","contentId":"2998051","authorDomain":"krishna109"}
  • 5 votes
#6.8 - Sun Jul 5, 2009 2:11 AM EDT
{"commentId":8032776,"authorDomain":"levofer"}

Tel Aviv will be the main target this time,but those long range missiles are a fairly easy target for the IAF as we saw in the Lebanon war(took most of them out within the first 2-3 hours)

{"commentId":8032776,"threadId":"619577","contentId":"2998051","authorDomain":"levofer"}
  • 4 votes
#6.9 - Sun Jul 5, 2009 2:18 AM EDT
{"commentId":8033065,"authorDomain":"watersportgirl"}
The fact that Saudi Arabia might let Israel use its airspace to attack an Islamic country would have been unthinkable a while back.

Really? Unthinkable? About as unthinkable as having U.S. airbases there.

Come on. Solidarity of Muslim world? Read some Middle East history. They feud as much as the rest of the world does.

{"commentId":8033065,"threadId":"619577","contentId":"2998051","authorDomain":"watersportgirl"}
  • 2 votes
#6.10 - Sun Jul 5, 2009 3:05 AM EDT
Reply
{"commentId":8032490,"authorDomain":"zstray1"}

The Iranian Shias hate the Saudi Sunnis about as much as they do Isreal... The Saudis are getting real nervous with Teharan and Bagdad being so close...... The Israeli can use the new technology to hide from radar the same as they did in Syria a while back....the thing is...the Saudis are not all that trustworthy...

{"commentId":8032490,"threadId":"619577","contentId":"2998051","authorDomain":"zstray1"}
  • 5 votes
Reply#7 - Sun Jul 5, 2009 1:39 AM EDT
{"commentId":8032714,"authorDomain":"krishna109"}
.the Saudis are not all that trustworthy...

Some of the jets can fly really fast-- I wonder how long it would take Israeli planes to traverse Saudi airspace? (Or-- perhaps they could travel along the Iraqi-Saudi border after a quick transit across Jordan?). It seems that they flew over Turkey in part of the flight to attack that Syrian reactor...I don't think the Turks admitted it publically...?

{"commentId":8032714,"threadId":"619577","contentId":"2998051","authorDomain":"krishna109"}
  • 5 votes
#7.1 - Sun Jul 5, 2009 2:08 AM EDT
Reply
{"commentId":8032935,"authorDomain":"el-iconoclast"}

Man, I have a really hard time seeing this coming to a satisfactory (from the US side) resolution.

{"commentId":8032935,"threadId":"619577","contentId":"2998051","authorDomain":"el-iconoclast"}
    Reply#8 - Sun Jul 5, 2009 2:43 AM EDT
    {"commentId":8032956,"authorDomain":"worldknightboy"}

    The longer the ayatollahs rule, the less satisfactory the outcome, for many more nations than just the US.

    {"commentId":8032956,"threadId":"619577","contentId":"2998051","authorDomain":"worldknightboy"}
    • 5 votes
    #8.1 - Sun Jul 5, 2009 2:46 AM EDT
    {"commentId":8032968,"authorDomain":"el-iconoclast"}

    Yeah, I guess the leadership and their nuclear program at this point would be pretty hard to seperate.

    Another example of the damage that religion can cause.

    {"commentId":8032968,"threadId":"619577","contentId":"2998051","authorDomain":"el-iconoclast"}
    • 1 vote
    #8.2 - Sun Jul 5, 2009 2:48 AM EDT
    Reply
    {"commentId":8033116,"authorDomain":"watersportgirl"}

    I hate to say it, but there is more to this than meets the eye. Again, it is oil. No doubt, the U.S. (largest consumer of oil) has bartered with the Saudis (largest producer of oil) for this on behalf of Israel.

    Ahmadinejadm, though wacky as he is, at least speaks the truth regarding Israel - they are illegally occupying territory and committing ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians.

    The Saudis just go for the money. They sell their soul to the highest bidder - the U.S.

    And the U.S. sells its soul to the highest bidder too.

    Political prostitution.

    {"commentId":8033116,"threadId":"619577","contentId":"2998051","authorDomain":"watersportgirl"}
    • 2 votes
    Reply#9 - Sun Jul 5, 2009 3:15 AM EDT
    {"commentId":8033142,"authorDomain":"krishna109"}
    No doubt, the U.S. (largest consumer of oil) has bartered with the Saudis (largest producer of oil) for this on behalf of Israel.

    So you think Obama's behind this?

    {"commentId":8033142,"threadId":"619577","contentId":"2998051","authorDomain":"krishna109"}
    • 3 votes
    #9.1 - Sun Jul 5, 2009 3:20 AM EDT
    {"commentId":8033150,"authorDomain":"krishna109"}
    I hate to say it,

    Why do you hate to say it?

    (Perhaps because you know there's no basis in fact-- its guess a wild guess? In fact, one based on a political agenda...? :)

    Btw, for starters-- check out this seed: A new cold war in the Middle East

    {"commentId":8033150,"threadId":"619577","contentId":"2998051","authorDomain":"krishna109"}
    • 3 votes
    #9.2 - Sun Jul 5, 2009 3:21 AM EDT
    {"commentId":8033172,"authorDomain":"krishna109"}
    Ahmadinejadm, though wacky as he is, at least speaks the truth regarding Israel - they are illegally occupying territory and committing ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians.

    Well, first of all-- that's false. But-- what does it have to do from the fact that Sunni Arab countries see him as a threat? This has nothing to do with Israel-Palestine issues:

    Most Arabs won't miss Iran's ayatollahs if they fall

    {"commentId":8033172,"threadId":"619577","contentId":"2998051","authorDomain":"krishna109"}
    • 5 votes
    #9.3 - Sun Jul 5, 2009 3:25 AM EDT
    {"commentId":8033180,"authorDomain":"krishna109"}
    And the U.S. sells its soul to the highest bidder too.

    And just who, exactly, do you think Obama is selling the our soul to?

    {"commentId":8033180,"threadId":"619577","contentId":"2998051","authorDomain":"krishna109"}
    • 4 votes
    #9.4 - Sun Jul 5, 2009 3:26 AM EDT
    {"commentId":8033213,"authorDomain":"worldknightboy"}
    Ahmadinejadm, though wacky as he is, at least speaks the truth regarding Israel

    Yup, he said Israel will be wiped from the face of the earth. He also denied The Holocaust.

    {"commentId":8033213,"threadId":"619577","contentId":"2998051","authorDomain":"worldknightboy"}
    • 5 votes
    #9.5 - Sun Jul 5, 2009 3:38 AM EDT
    {"commentId":8033328,"authorDomain":"krishna109"}
    Ahmadinejadm, though wacky as he is,

    Perhaps you should watch this recent video about what his thugs are doing to student activists

    {"commentId":8033328,"threadId":"619577","contentId":"2998051","authorDomain":"krishna109"}
    • 5 votes
    #9.6 - Sun Jul 5, 2009 4:12 AM EDT
    {"commentId":8035787,"authorDomain":"watersportgirl"}

    I started to compose a response to you, Krishna, but first I checked out your newsvine site. A lot of sensational seeds. Then I looked for your comments, but you do not show them. Then I looked at your "Essential Reading" and was initially impressed that you had read all those books...

    ...but then I saw that your "Essential Reading" is nothing more than editorial websites, YouTube and your own seeds.

    I would be very careful as to defining my foreign policy according to YouTube. We've had enough armchair politics from TV-As-My-Resource Americans who have studied nary a bit of Middle Eastern history.

    {"commentId":8035787,"threadId":"619577","contentId":"2998051","authorDomain":"watersportgirl"}
    • 2 votes
    #9.7 - Sun Jul 5, 2009 11:15 AM EDT
    {"commentId":8037169,"authorDomain":"worldknightboy"}

    Great linked video as always, krishna. It is a tremendous benefit to all who desire to get smarter! :-)

    {"commentId":8037169,"threadId":"619577","contentId":"2998051","authorDomain":"worldknightboy"}
    • 4 votes
    #9.8 - Sun Jul 5, 2009 12:41 PM EDT
    {"commentId":8042934,"authorDomain":"krishna109"}
    I started to compose a response to you, Krishna, but first I checked out your newsvine site. A lot of sensational seeds.

    Yes-- I do tend to try to focus on important issues-- you'll not find much about Britney in my NV columns :)

    (Well, occasionally I do post trivia-- but merely for an occasional break. Underneath, I am a very serious person).

    So-- what sign are you? Pisces?

    Scorpio? Cancer?

    Then I looked for your comments, but you do not show them.

    Well, a while back a group of overly enthusiastic self-appointed guardians of the public morality on NV accused me of being "the pointman on NV for a terrorist group"-- so the list of my comments and my friends remains hidden just to make it more difficult for them to spread their nonsense...(of course they still persisted)

    Then I looked at your "Essential Reading" and was initially impressed that you had read all those books......but then I saw that your "Essential Reading" is nothing more than editorial websites, YouTube and your own seeds.

    Well, I've often done the same thing with people I didn't know on NV...oftimes it is a quick way to find out about a person. In my case it is a bit more difficult, however, as I am a bit more complex-- and much more knowledgeable in some specialized areas-- than many here (yes, I know that sounds arrogant...but what can I say..its true! :^)

    And-- if you knew all the books I've read on those subjects, you might be quite impressed. But I didn't list them.

    Why?

    For starters-- reading can be done from books-- or from websites. In both cases there's garbage..and there's "gold". So why did I only list websites? Well, I figured most Viners might check them out, but fewer people read books now-a-days. And websites are more up to date than older books-- in some cases that's an additional plus.

    I would be very careful as to defining my foreign policy according to YouTube. We've had enough armchair politics from TV-As-My-Resource Americans who have studied nary a bit of Middle Eastern history.

    Oh, I definitely agree. However, as with the cases discussed above (both websites and books may be of great value, or might be garbage)-- the same applies to YouTube videos. (Would you really want to rely only on books for coverage of the recent Iranian street protests? Did not websites and videos provide info that books could not?)

    So-- the key thing in this age of information deluge is..how to interpret information wisely.

    And, btw-- my knowlege of the mideast is not based soley upon YouTube videos! While I do agree to some degree with Marshall McLuhan's "the media is the message"-- to some degree I also feel that-- the actual message is the message! It rewires some wisdom to interpret all this information...but there are factal and useful YouTube videos amongst the dreck...

    What I say is based not only on YouTube (actually, very little is-- but I find that carefully selected videos can make a point very well). Its based partially upon many years of my life spent as a human-rights activist. And-- re: the mid-east--I've lived in Israel-- several times-- worked as a volunteer on 2 very different kibbutzim-- lived in tel Aviv working on a photoshoot with some top Israeli fashiopn models-- lived for a few weeks in Tangier, spent time in Egypt-- a bit more than you will see in my NV column.

    We've had enough armchair politics from TV-As-My-Resource Americans who have studied nary a bit of Middle Eastern history.

    I don't watch TV*. Ever.

    (I don't even own a working TV :)

    And I've studied quite a bit of mid-east history.

    ---

    *Well, occasionally I see it when I'm on the treadmill at the gym...but that's very, very limited...and most of the screens display sports...i try to stay away from it...

    {"commentId":8042934,"threadId":"619577","contentId":"2998051","authorDomain":"krishna109"}
    • 2 votes
    #9.9 - Sun Jul 5, 2009 7:01 PM EDT
    {"commentId":8059449,"authorDomain":"watersportgirl"}

    Sorry, Krishna. I don't think you understood the word "sensationalism".

    Media sensationalism: a manner of being extremely controversial, loud, or attention grabbing. It is especially applied to the emphasis of the unusual or atypical. It is also a form of theatre.

    Unfortunately, the internet has surpassed television as a sensational media outlet.

    Peer reviewed journal articles are the best resource.

    {"commentId":8059449,"threadId":"619577","contentId":"2998051","authorDomain":"watersportgirl"}
      #9.10 - Mon Jul 6, 2009 5:05 PM EDT
      {"commentId":8060675,"authorDomain":"krishna109"}
      Media sensationalism: a manner of being extremely controversial, loud, or attention grabbing. It is especially applied to the emphasis of the unusual or atypical. It is also a form of theatre.

      A good description of much of what goes on on Newsvine! (Well-- those seeds that get votes and comments-- those that do not meet your criteria for "Media sensationalism" often attract little attention-- no discussion or perhaps 1 or 2 comments and a similar number of votes.

      Unfortunately, the internet has surpassed television as a sensational media outlet.

      Why do you consider that to be unfortunate?

      Peer reviewed journal articles are the best resource.

      Best for what? Certainly not for "reaching the masses"...

      {"commentId":8060675,"threadId":"619577","contentId":"2998051","authorDomain":"krishna109"}
      • 2 votes
      #9.11 - Mon Jul 6, 2009 6:02 PM EDT
      Reply
      {"commentId":8041468,"authorDomain":"bker1492"}

      Ah yes its always the oil and always the U.S. It couldn't possibly be the fact that the Iranians are persians and not arabs. It couldn't be the fact that the iranians have threatened most of the countires on the Arab penninsula side for years. It couldn't possibly be Irans claims on the country of Bahrain. Couldn't possibly be the fact that iran claims most of the arab leadership as heretics. It couldn't possibly be the fact that Iran would love to own the two holiest locations in all of Islam. It couldn't possibly be the fact that Iran has declared the Holocaust to be a lie and the destruction of Israel as thier number one want. It couldn't possibly be the fact that the U.S only imports 2% of the Natural Gas and 2% of Refined Petroleum products sold by Saudi Arabia, or that China, Japan, and korea are its biggest customers.

      It always oil.

      {"commentId":8041468,"threadId":"619577","contentId":"2998051","authorDomain":"bker1492"}
      • 2 votes
      Reply#10 - Sun Jul 5, 2009 5:22 PM EDT
      {"commentId":8060725,"authorDomain":"krishna109"}

      Ah yes its always the oil and always the U.S. It couldn't possibly be the fact that the Iranians are persians and not arabs. It couldn't be the fact that the iranians have threatened most of the countires on the Arab penninsula side for years. It couldn't possibly be Irans claims on the country of Bahrain. Couldn't possibly be the fact that iran claims most of the arab leadership as heretics. It couldn't possibly be the fact that Iran would love to own the two holiest locations in all of Islam. It couldn't possibly be the fact that Iran has declared the Holocaust to be a lie and the destruction of Israel as thier number one want. It couldn't possibly be the fact that the U.S only imports 2% of the Natural Gas and 2% of Refined Petroleum products sold by Saudi Arabia, or that China, Japan, and korea are its biggest customers.

      It always oil.

      Well---- as a "peer'-- I'd like to give your comment a "peer review"-- albeit a brief one: excellent comment! Several excellent points-- also things not known by many on the 'Vine. Very helpful... :)

      {"commentId":8060725,"threadId":"619577","contentId":"2998051","authorDomain":"krishna109"}
      • 2 votes
      #10.1 - Mon Jul 6, 2009 6:04 PM EDT
      {"commentId":8064275,"authorDomain":"worldknightboy"}

      Well, I am far from being a 'peer' of krishna, and in fact would freely acknowledge Krishna is without 'peer' here, but I agree with his sentiments immediately above! :-)

      {"commentId":8064275,"threadId":"619577","contentId":"2998051","authorDomain":"worldknightboy"}
      • 1 vote
      #10.2 - Mon Jul 6, 2009 8:25 PM EDT
      Reply
      {"commentId":8042455,"authorDomain":"krishna109"}

      Interesting recent related seed: Time for an Israeli Strike?

      {"commentId":8042455,"threadId":"619577","contentId":"2998051","authorDomain":"krishna109"}
      • 2 votes
      Reply#11 - Sun Jul 5, 2009 6:27 PM EDT
      {"commentId":8072259,"authorDomain":"Ezbe"}

      And the Musim world blames Amercia for all its ills. I have been advocating them look in yourself. Even the creation of Israel in the midst of The Muslim World was by The Arabs and not any body else. Had they not let Britain create Israel by not conspiring with them to oust the Muslim Caliphate the present turmoil would not have been there.

      {"commentId":8072259,"threadId":"619577","contentId":"2998051","authorDomain":"Ezbe"}
      • 1 vote
      Reply#12 - Tue Jul 7, 2009 9:35 AM EDT
      {"commentId":8073447,"authorDomain":"Ezbe"}

      All arrangements were made by Israel to attack Pakistan Nuclear facilities once. A deal was also struck with Advani of India to refuell over the Arabian Sea. It was only and only Mr. Vajpayee who stopped it as he thought it would have been disatrous for India in the long run. And here we have Saudi Arabia, champions of Muslims sanctioning a strike on another Muslim Country. What did they gain earlier by helping Iraq destroy Iran? Nothing. They had Gulf war. Saudi Arabia further lost a lot of money. Easy come easy go. Iraq was destroyed at the end of chain of events with 1,200,000 Iraqis dead. The two problems of the Muslim world, Palestine and Kashmir are still burning and more are being created. People who do not address the real issues will see this fate always.

      {"commentId":8073447,"threadId":"619577","contentId":"2998051","authorDomain":"Ezbe"}
        Reply#13 - Tue Jul 7, 2009 10:47 AM EDT
        {"commentId":8074329,"authorDomain":"el-iconoclast"}

        Where do you get your 1.2 Million dead Iraqi figure? The current war has claimed approximately 100,00 Iraqi lives. Does that include all the 90's? Sanctions? Iraq - Iran War?

        {"commentId":8074329,"threadId":"619577","contentId":"2998051","authorDomain":"el-iconoclast"}
          #13.1 - Tue Jul 7, 2009 11:32 AM EDT
          Reply
          {"canLink":false,"threadId":"619577","isPrivate":false}
          Leave a Comment:
          You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead.
          As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
          {"threadId":"619577","contentId":"2998051"}
          Start TrackingStart Tracking
          Stop TrackingStop Tracking