Al Qaeda tells China's Uyghurs to prepare for holy war

let's see, it would be interesting to see how china deals with islamic extremism?

My guess is that they will deal with it the same way they deal with other groups who dissent-- extremely brutally!

But of course in terms of the violent jihadis-- they are dealing with a group that is equally barbaric-- this will get very ugly.

Will not this violation of human rights and basic universal values?

Since China's involved, I would say "definitely yes".

(And, now that I think of it-- the same goes for al-Qaeda).

Islamic extremism-- and a brutal dictatorship. Neither of which has the slightest concern for human rights...two really nasty forces at play here.

And this will undoubtedly open up a whole avenue of talks and cooperation between China and the US.

Maybe.

But I wonder which side (if any) Obama will want to support? Would he dare to support China and be seen as anti-Muslim? But-- would he dare support the other side-- the side that al-Qaeda has aligned themselves with?

He could choose to remain neutral (neutral . . . when al-Qaeda is involved?)-- have Hillary make some sort of "U.N. wannabee-like" statement "condemning acts of violence by all involved" yadda yadda yadda...saying and doing nothing of much significance.

But, as the old saying goes:

Confucius say: "Man standing in middle of road get hit by cars going in both directions".

This may create quite a dilemma for the Obama administration...

These people are picking a fight with both US and CHINA?

And Canada

There is LITTLE better news as far as i'm concerned.. the enemy of your enemy is your friend.. And this will undoubtedly open up a whole avenue of talks and cooperation between China and the US.

Actually, that was my initial reponse as well. This could make a significant change in the balance of power in the war agaiainst Islamic extremism (erroneously labeled "The War Against Terror" by the politically correct).

I think this is actually WWIV...its the Islamic extremists against...everyone else! Little by little more and more countries will come to realize the true nature of the threat-- the chinese are just the latest to wake up...

The sad part, of ocurse, is that many innocent people will suffer...but then that's always the case when Islamists swing into action :-(

And possibly Germany :

http://www.newsvine.com/_news/2009/09/26/3318674-islamic-threat-hangs-over-germanys-national-vote?commentId=9742042#c9742042

Important article-- thanks for the link :)

Al Qaeda tells China's Uyghurs to prepare for holy war

holy $hit, another holy war....?

Actually its not another war war ("jihad")-- its all part of the same worldwide jihad by Islamic extremists (AKA "Islamists").

The politically correct media tries to perpetrate the myth that these are all siolated, unrelated incidents-- but they're all part fo the same struggle for word dom9nation-- from the two attacks on the WTC, to the terror attacks on the London Underground, the Madrid trains, the Moscow theatre-- the Chechnya & Ma'Alot schoolhouse massacres-- the "beltway snipers"..the "Chapel Hill Jihadi"...Bali...the beheadiong of Bhuddist Monks in Thailand-- and Christians in the Phillapines...burning of Christian Churches in Nigeria..destruction of Chrurches in Egypt..the list goers on and on.

Perhaps the best explanation of it all I've seen is in this short video. Its specifically about the jiadi group Hamas...but if you understand their motives, you understabnd the motives of the rest:

"Forget everything the mainstream media tells you about the "cycle of violence" and the "peace process." The conflict in the Middle East boils down to one issue; the imposition of Islam upon the world. Hamas, as a Muslim Brotherhood affiliate, is perfectly open about its desire for a global Islamic caliphate. Such an enemy by definition can never be appeased, and must be destroyed".

china will not be so nice as O has been. they will most likely be crushed with little impunity. no holds barred. the chinese will kill first and then not even ask questions later.

I think you're right.

In fact-- the Chinese might even make Bush look like a pussycat by comparison!

Who do you root for?

And, I'm wondering-- who will the Obama administration vote for...?

Next up for Al-Qaeda---flying planes into Beijing buildings a la NYC.

Or even just trying to blow up a building with explosives in a truck-- remember when Islamists tried that? (Their first attempt at bringing down the WTC):

1993: World Trade Center bomb terrorises New York
A suspected car bomb has exploded underneath the World Trade Center in New York killing at least five people and injuring scores more.
The bombing has shocked America which had seemed immune from acts of terrorism that have plagued other parts of the world.

An emotional Mario Cuomo, New York's state governor, told journalists: "We all have that feeling of being violated. No foreign people or force has ever done this to us. Until now we were invulnerable."

(LINK)

Of course that was just one of many terror attacks ..worldwide.

If and when that happens, we ask Red China to send 1 million Red troops into Afghanistan to mop up the Taliban and man the border to Pakistan.

Somehow I had always thought of Afghanistan as being further west than it actually is. After I read this article I looked at a map-- and saw that it has a common border with-- China! (And of course Pakistan border China as well).

Also if the 2 countries border each other
what would stop China from just appropriating Afghanistan ?
And would that be so bad ?

Interesting (and important!) questions.

Russia was a great force in helping the Allies to win WWII. With all the trading and friendly relations we have with China, I see no reason they shouldn't help in Afhganistan.

Especially now-- since its not only about helping the U.S.-- because now the Chinese are taking it personally: The dead bodies of Han Chinese victims following Monday's riots

At any rate, after your dead and gone, those brave men who sent you to your death will still be hiding in caves, Alive.

As is sop often the case... :-(

Lots of comments about just "how nice" the US (regardless of the POTUS) has been about the whole "You are an infidel because you don't believe as we do" thing. Which I agree with, by the way....way to nice.

I say, let them wage jihad on China. It's time someone got rid of the extremists!

My guess is that as this progresses-- well, let's just say that the next Nobel Peace Prize will not be awarded to the leader of China ....if ya catch my drift :-)

Actually, if China does rid the world of extremists (those that only wish ill of those that think differently than they) then perhaps China should actually earn the Nobel Peace Prize!

"Should".

But unlike the Noble Prizes in , say, science-- the so-called "Peace Prize" is a total fraud (even Yasser Arafat go it!)

I've worked with Chinese nationals (engineers that gained education from the US) and although they do look down on others that believe in a higher power, they 'tolerate' them! :)

I have no complaints against the Chinese-- in fact, I greatly respect and admire their culture-- it is ancient, and over the centuries they have accumulated much wisdom.

What I don't care for is the current regime...

He described China's presence in Xinjiang as an "occupation".

Where have I herad that term before? Maybe this is not an isolated situation?

Old story, new territory. If it is true maybe China has the right approach to keeping down the spread of Islam. Something we should think about.

The sneak attack on Pearl Harbour really pissed off Americans--and that was aimed at the military. Here's the thing about terrorism deliberately aimed at civilians. it gets the targtet popualtion very, very angry. And if initial efforts to contain violent jihad-- then the attacks are stepped up (and the "useful idiots" of the world appoint Gioldstone Commissions-- to "investigate" sefl-defense efforts of the vitim population...

Maybe it would prevent ethnic cleansing (in reverse) in countries like Africa...Darfur comes to mind.

Or..maybe China should just negotiate "without preconditions"...

/sarcasm

the holy war to achieved peace on earth can not involve arms but spirit of God

I would assume that spirit of peacefulness and non-violence is what inspired you to choose the screen-name of "fightback"?

Peace and Love!

fight back against injustices don't commit injustice, committing unjust actions that wouldn't be fighting back that would be attacking, non-violence means do something to fix the wrong and avoid committing wrong action that could harm any one physical or mentally it can be done , it's not easy to accomplish.but providing peace for all involved if anyone fightback while being wrong it bring doom to the self, if you fightback on the positive to bring forth positive it bring forth blessing complicated and many fall in this trap, fightback only to defend what is right for human being including your self. if it not good for other its not good for you either. that's the confusion of the Taliban,they think fight in only one view their view with out regard for the others and that can only bring trouble for every one.

non-violence means do something to fix the wrong and avoid committing wrong action that could harm any one physical or mentally, it can be done , it's not easy to accomplish. wisdom is the unswer.

Thanks for the explanation :-)

I guess when I saw the word "fight" I had immediately thought of violence -- but you do have a point-- it could mean non-violence as well.